Exclusive: Selective outrage over civilian suffering in Syria – hyping
Syrian government abuses while downplaying the effects of U.S.-led
Coalition air strikes – undermines the legitimacy of human rights
advocacy, argues Jonathan Marshall. Few things threaten the legitimacy
of human rights advocacy more than partisans invoking it selectively to
promote one side in a violent conflict. That’s why people with genuine
concern over the plight of war victims should be disturbed by the latest
pumped-up campaign of selective outrage over the Syrian government’s
bombing of Eastern Ghouta, a suburb of Damascus. That bombing has
unquestionably been savage, and arguably even criminal. It should be
condemned.
Source: Yahoo News
No comments:
Post a Comment